Yet Another Bad Day For Us All!

article-2231266-15F7D1F2000005DC-53_634x917

Sgt Danny Nightingale recommended for discharge from Army

An SAS sniper who was charged with illegally possessing a pistol and ammunition has been recommended to be medically discharged from the Army.

The Medical Board of the British Army said sniper Sgt Danny Nightingale should be discharged as a result of brain damage he suffered in 2009.

A judge ordered the retrial of Sgt Nightingale, from Crewe, on Wednesday.

His military detention sentence had been overturned at the Court of Appeal in March.

At his court martial in November, Sgt Nightingale, 38, had denied illegally possessing a 9mm Glock pistol and ammunition, found in Hereford by West Mercia Police.

His lawyer Simon McKay said the medical board had recommended the soldier should be discharged as a result of serious brain damage caused following his collapse while on a charity run in the Amazon jungle four years ago.

In a statement, Sgt Nightingale said he was “devastated” his SAS service had come to an end, but recognised the brain injury meant he could no longer carry out his normal duties.

Judge Jonathan Perkins (Contd.)

Judge Jonathan Perkins

Judge Jonathan Perkins

Judge Jonathan Perkins you are a disgrace to your country!!!!!!!!!!!!!

McLarenfan, Leicester, United Kingdom, 28/4/2013 10:27

Rating   2880

No wonder the Conservatives are running scared of UKIP!!

masboro, Doha, 28/4/2013 10:27

Rating   2252

DUMP YARD UK !!!!! SEND ALL YOUR CRIMINALS !!!!! HERE WE WILL WELCOMBE THEM !!!!!!!!

g landon, leicester, 28/4/2013 12:42

Rating   2133

This ludicrous situation makes Judge Jonathon Perkins and the British Judiciary look like useless fools. They are not fit for purpose and the govenment really do need to weed out some of the more out of touch individuals in the system as they are becoming more dangerous to the public at large than the criminal scum they protect.

Pete66, Stourbridge, United Kingdom, 28/4/2013 10:24

Rating   1878

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2316026/Convicted-drug-dealer-abandoned-children-allowed-stay-Britain-girlfriend.html#ixzz2RpnXNd23

Whilst Réading This…..

Dickiebo Daily

Iraqi drug dealer who abandoned two children told he can stay in UK because he has a girlfriend (and ‘his tattoo of half-naked woman could lead to persecution’)

  • Hesham Mohammed Ali won appeal against Home Secretary Theresa May
  • Ali, 36, avoided deportation to native Iraq by arguing right to a family life
  • He met girlfriend in 2005 and has a tattoo of half-naked Western woman
  • Home Office spends thousands of pounds trying to boot Ali out of Britain

By MARK DUELL

PUBLISHED: 09:28, 28 April 2013

A convicted drug dealer who abandoned his two children by different women has been allowed to stay in Britain because he has a girlfriend in this country, it was revealed today.

Hesham Mohammed Ali, 36, won an appeal against Home Secretary Theresa May who wanted to deport him to his native Iraq by successfully arguing that this would breach his right to a family life.

He told Judge Jonathan Perkins he had a ‘genuine’ relationship with his British beautician girlfriend Cy Harwood, 31, and that his life would be in danger in Iraq because he was covered in tattoos.

Hesham Mohammed Ali

Victory: Hesham Mohammed Ali (left), 36, won an appeal against Home Secretary Theresa May who wanted to deport him to his native Iraq by successfully arguing that this would breach his right to a family life

One of these was of a half-naked Western woman, he said. The Home Office has spent thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ cash trying to boot out Ali – battling his initial appeal and a second hearing.

A Home Office spokesman told the Sunday Telegraph it was ‘disappointed’, adding that ‘foreigners who commit serious crimes should be deported, regardless of whether they have family in the UK’.

Ali, who has no contact with his two children from an Irish woman and another from Liverpool, came to Britain ‘irregularly’ by a people-smuggling gang in 2000, reported the Sunday Telegraph.

Two years later Ali had an asylum claim and an appeal rejected, but he was not deported for reasons unknown. Then he was convicted of possessing Class A and Class C drugs in 2005 and fined.

Decision: Ali told Judge Jonathan Perkins (pictured) he had a 'genuine' relationship with his British beautician girlfriend Cy Harwood, 31, and that his life would be in danger in Iraq because he was covered in tattoosDecision: Ali told Judge Jonathan Perkins (pictured) he had a ‘genuine’ relationship with his British beautician girlfriend Cy Harwood, 31, and that his life would be in danger in Iraq because he was covered in tattoos

One year after that Ali was convicted of possessing Class A drugs with intent to supply and was sent to prison for four years, reported the Sunday Telegraph.

‘Foreigners who commit serious crimes should be deported, regardless of whether they have family in the UK’

Immigration laws state that any foreigner imprisoned for at least one year should be automatically deported. The Home Office told him that this was its intention, but a lack of clarity over his real nationality stopped this happening.

Ali was bailed in 2009 – and deportation action restarted in 2010 before he put in an appeal.

At the second hearing he was allowed to stay by the judge because of his girlfriend. He said he was impressed by evidence from Miss Harwood, whom Ali met in 2005, reported the Sunday Telegraph.

Ali said he had worked as a wrestling promoter and dancer – and had even once passed an audition to work for music mogul Simon Cowell, but was arrested before he could start work.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2316026/Convicted-drug-dealer-abandoned-children-allowed-stay-Britain-girlfriend.html#ixzz2RkdHg5B1

I came across this;

Judge who let Taliban soldier remain in Britain now allows refugee who raped girl, 12, stay in UK

by SHEIKYERMAMI on JULY 16, 2012

Protecting Islamic terrorists, affording them million-dollar homes and placing the ‘human rights’ of dangerous rapists and other criminals above the safety of their own people: Absurd UK sinks deeper into submission every day.

Daily Mail

  • Sani Adil Ali was described as a ‘potential danger to young girls’ by the judge who sentenced him for the sex attack on the child
  • Senior immigration judge Jonathan Perkins said it would breach the 28-year-old’s human rights to deport Ali
  • Ministers insist they are powerless to act
Ruling: Immigration Judge Jonathan Perkins, pictured, said Ali can stay in Britain
Ruling: Immigration Judge Jonathan Perkins, pictured, said Ali can stay in Britain 

A Sudanese asylum seeker who raped a 12-year-old girl has been allowed to remain in Britain – after a judge ruled it would breach his human rights to deport him.

Sani Adil Ali was jailed for raping the girl just months after he was given refugee status.

When he was sentenced, another judge described him as ‘a potential danger to young girls’ and put him on the Sex Offenders’ Register for the rest of his life.

But after serving a three-year sentence, an immigration tribunal ruled Ali could stay in Britain on the grounds that he could be in danger if he returned to Sudan.

Senior immigration judge Jonathan Perkins allowed the 28-year-old to remain in Britain, even though the rapist’s probation officers found that he presented some risk to young people.

In his ruling, Judge Perkins said: ‘We find that the appellant is still entitled to the protection of the Refugee Convention and the Qualification Directive.

‘In any event, removing him would be contrary to the United Kingdom’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.’

It is not the first time that Judge Perkins has made a controversial decision. Last month, The Mail on Sunday reported how he allowed an Afghan Muslim, who claimed he killed people while fighting for the Taliban, to remain in Britain.

It has also been reported that Judge Perkins has often allowed foreign criminals to remain in Britain because of their ‘right to a family life’ under the Human Rights Act.

His latest decision is another setback for Home Secretary Theresa May, whose plans to crack down on the way foreign criminals use human rights to avoid being deported appear to be repeatedly undermined by the courts.

Charlie Elphicke, Conservative MP for Dover & Deal, who has tabled a Bill to replace the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights, said: ‘Britain will always be there to provide refuge to those in need. But people who commit crimes here should be sent back immediately.

‘Right-thinking people in Britain will be appalled that this person will be allowed to stay here. It sums up what is wrong with the European human rights laws.

‘We should have zero tolerance of refugees who commit crimes. Cases like this are why I have tabled a British Bill of Rights so we can control our borders and ensure that foreign criminals and terrorists are deported immediately.’

Ali had attacked the 12-year-old girl while he was staying with her family during a five-day trip to Sheffield

Threat: Judge Jonathan Perkins allowed an Afghan Muslim, who claimed he killed people while fighting for the Taliban, similar to those pictured, to remain in Britain
Threat: Judge Jonathan Perkins allowed an Afghan Muslim, who claimed he killed people while fighting for the Taliban, similar to those pictured, to remain in Britain 

Ali, who is from the Darfur region, arrived in Britain in October 2003 and was awarded refugee status in February 2005.

But two months later he was arrested at his address in Middlesbrough over the rape of a 12-year-old  Hungarian girl.

Ali had attacked her while staying with her family during a five-day trip to Sheffield. The victim’s family had offered to put him up while he visited his friend, Kamel Ahmed, then 22, also from Darfur.

Ali and Ahmed knew each other and the girl’s family from refugee camps in Italy and France.

Ali, who pleaded guilty to one count of child rape, was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment at Sheffield Crown Court. Ahmed was convicted of three counts of child rape and jailed for ten years.

Judge Michael Murphy QC, said: ‘I regard each of you as a potential danger to young girls and so each of you will be banned for the rest of your life from ever taking up a job which involves working with children under 16.’

When Ali was released from Doncaster jail in 2008, the Home Office ordered that he return to Sudan and he was locked up in an immigration removal centre.

Ali appealed to the immigration court and when a judge rejected his bid, he mounted a fresh appeal to the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber.

At the Sheffield hearing, Judge Perkins ruled that removing Ali, who comes from the Zaghawa tribe, would breach his rights under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits torture or inhumane punishment.

Judge Perkins referred to a 2009 ruling which stated that non-Arab tribes such as the Zaghawa are ‘at risk of persecution in Darfur and cannot reasonably be expected to relocate elsewhere in Sudan’.

The judge also said Ali could not be deported because he was not a danger to the public, and therefore could not have his refugee status taken away from him.

He said that even though his probation officers found he ‘presented some risk to young people’, Ali had ‘faced up to his responsibilities and indicated an intention to behave himself in the future’.

It is believed Ali was allowed to leave the immigration removal centre around 2009 and then moved to Newcastle, and still lives in the North East. It is not known if he received legal aid to fund his immigration fight.

Last night the Government admitted it was powerless in the face of the tribunal’s decision, with an aide to Mrs May stressing there was nothing the Home Secretary could do. ‘We are at the mercy of the courts,’ they said.

The UK Border Agency said: ‘We do not believe this individual needs or deserves refuge in this country.’

a

Just what is it with these totally insane judges? Between this idíot and the idiot Mitting, our country is becoming home to every deranged lunatic from across Africa. High time that something was done to rein in these legal loonies. Better late than never!

No Longer Safe – In Our Own Country!

Dickiebo Daily

YOU THINK THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY???? ABU QATADA WALKS THE STREETS AND PEOPLE LIKE THIS WOMAN ARE JAILED BY THE SCUM JUDICIARY. ARISE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND BEFORE THERE ARE NO FREEDOMS LEFT.

Samuel Pickwick, Anywhere BUT London, United Kingdom, 24/4/2013 0:30

So she goes to prison for caring for her father and a HIV known paedophile is free to work with children as it is his human right!!! Disgusting.

AM, Hants, 24/4/2013 0:34

fascist state. run by evil people.

Man on the Moon, the Moon, 24/4/2013 2:10

Seriously what is the world coming to? People need to stand as one its the only way this will stop. This disgusts me. This is far from the only evil that’s happening. 1 day old babies snatched from their parents by social services and police. People need to wake up and stand against the evil corporate machine.

daithomas24, Swansea, United Kingdom, 24/4/2013 2:10

I am so glad I don`t live in UK what a SICK system to JAIL the daughter for being concerned about her Father.Who are they protecting? Certainly not the Father or is it their Jobs in a thoughtless Department.What a Disgrace!

tamara, Nairobi, 24/4/2013 1:53

This is truly worrying and extremely sinister, similar to the Patriot Act in the USA where anybody can just be taken away and tried in secret and locked away for a long time with no rights at all, this story should be headlining and everybody should really be letting all in power know that this must be stopped, it could be any of us next for the most nothing of reasons…do you not find that frightening? then speak up..

isabel, france, 24/4/2013 0:41

Oh my god, another case of social services and the law ruining peoples lives. Its heartbreaking. There has been scandal after scandal about the care of vulnerable adults in care homes. Are families really now being punished for caring about their own parents. Social workers are quite honestly often middle class individuals who have never had to live in the real world. They sit in their offices and make decisions based on brief assessments. They use the law if threatened with challenge. People need to start understanding how frightening it is to live in this country now. The power that social services has is frightening. I have worked alongside social workers for many years and the big problem is that it all depends upon the common sense of the person you end up with.

jane, Rhyl in dendighshire, 24/4/2013 1:55

Labour = curtailing of free speech = secret trials = state control!

Gartempe, Sheffield England, 24/4/2013 1:58

If someone is willing to look after their own father at home then nobody should put obsticles in their way. Why shouldn’t children be allowed to look after their parents? This big brother attitude is a disgrace.

eyespyagain, Colchester, United Kingdom, 24/4/2013 0:31

No rights left for anyone families must be in turmoil with decisions like this taken out of their hands it more like a dictatorship with every story that we read

TINKERBELL, HALIFAX, 24/4/2013 0:42

The sinister spread of justice behind closed doors, writes Christopher Brooker

Today’s revelations in the Mail about Wanda Maddocks, the woman imprisoned by a judge for trying to remove her 80-year-old father from a care home where he was being held against his family’s wishes, are truly shocking.

Most disturbing of all is that it is only thanks to persistent inquiries by the Mail that we know of her fate at all — for the court heard the case in secret and chose not to publish the ruling containing details of her sentence.

The court that conducted itself in this manner is the mysterious and secretive Court of Protection, set up in 2005 under the Labour government’s Mental Capacity Act to give state officials quite extraordinary powers over the lives of people who are deemed no longer fit to handle their own affairs.

Miss Maddocks was found guilty of contempt because she ignored the Court of Protection’s orders not to interfere with her father’s life in the care home.

What angered the judge and the council involved, Stoke-on-Trent, was not just that she took her father away but that she desperately tried to publicise what was happening to him by writing a leaflet about it.

Of course, the case is complicated and highly emotive — one in which family members concerned for their ailing, elderly father are pitted against professionals and state employees who insist they know better.

But it is also part of a deeply worrying trend of secret justice taking hold across Britain, where journalists, the public and even defendants are barred from hearing evidence, while those in the dock often have no legal representation.

The Court of Protection is making huge numbers of judgments in secret which devastate families such as that of Wanda Maddocks.

Only this week, there was the tragic case of a 64-year-old mother from a working-class family who left her husband and ran off with her neighbour to the Midlands, without an explanation.

The family spent months trying to track her down, and finally found her in a nursing home after she had suffered a massive stroke that left her needing 24-hour care. When they called to see her, the nursing home — claiming she had written letters saying she wanted to break off contact with them — called the police.

After hearing the evidence in secret, the judge decided the family should no longer have contact with their mother — even though an American forensic expert who used computer analysis on handwriting testified that he was ‘99.9 per cent’ certain the letters were written by the man she ran off with.

For months I have been following a terrifying case involving a council which cannot be named, and which has similarly been hidden away from public view by another judge of the same Court of Protection.

The story would make your hair curl. But because it is under the aegis of the Court of Protection, I am forbidden from reporting on it at all. None of its details can be made public.

Local press that did cover the story so irked the council and the judge that other media were told that any further reporting of the case would be a contempt of court, punishable by imprisonment.

Like the case of Miss Maddocks, it highlights a tendency to allow Britain’s courts to hide their workings from public view behind a wall of secrecy.

The Mail mounted a hard-hitting campaign for open justice after the Government proposed last year that judges could be allowed to hold secret hearings in terrorist cases, on the grounds that allowing these to be reported might be damaging to ‘national security’.

Similar concerns have been expressed over the fear that the Leveson inquiry might trigger a massive extension in the powers of judges to throw up a blanket of secrecy around other types of cases they are hearing, such as those involving celebrities keen to preserve their reputation.

But the terrifying fact is that we already have a whole swathe of secret courts in this country, where judges are allowed to exclude the public and the Press, and to issue draconian gagging orders to prevent anything being reported of what goes on.

Any breach of those orders can be ruled a contempt of court, punishable not just by imprisonment but by the confiscation of an offender’s possessions.

One of the most glaring examples of justice behind closed doors is to be found in the extraordinary goings on of our so-called ‘child protection’ system, where social workers using family courts can too often tear families apart for the flimsiest and most dubious of reasons,

In such cases, all the normal principles of British justice can be turned on their heads. The rules, which in criminal courts require evidence to be put to a proper test, can be routinely ignored.

Social workers and lawyers can trot out hearsay allegations which are accepted by the court as if they were proven fact, ‘expert psychologists’ are paid thousands of pounds to come up with patently ridiculous reports, which parents fearful that they may lose their children for ever are not permitted to question.

Police could soon be banned from identifying people they have arrested by a recommendation of the Leveson Inquiry

What is so shocking to parents who fall foul of this system — as I have learned from talking to scores of them over the years — is how they can find themselves being treated, without any need for proof, as criminals, having to listen to any kind of allegation being made against them without being given a right of reply.

The point is that none of these abuses could take place if the judges had not been allowed to hide away the workings of these courts behind a far greater wall of secrecy than anything intended by the politicians who passed the supposedly well-meaning Acts of Parliament which gave them their powers in the first place.

The overwhelming moral of all this is that wherever courts are allowed to operate in secret, the system is likely to be corrupted.

Few things are more sinister in Britain today than all those pressures to extend even further that suffocating blanket of secrecy, for we can already see — as in the frightening case of Miss Maddocks and the Court of Protection — how easily it can lead to any sense of justice being thrown out of the window.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2313760/Wanda-Maddocks-Jailed-secret–trying-rescue-father-care-home-believed-die.html#ixzz2RMi0twdu

Dickiebo says (3)a

a

Nothing to worry about here, folks. Just go back to sleep until they come knocking on YOUR door. 

A bit like how Hitler took over a country. Isn’t it?

For How Much Longer, Oh Lord?

Dickiebo Daily

Hamza lieutenant wins European human rights battle over extradition

European judges have barred the extradition of a lieutenant of hate preacher Abu Hamza to America because it will breach his human rights.

European judges have barred the extradition of a lieutenant of hate preacher Abu Hamza to America because it will breach his human rights.

Haroon Aswat suffers from paranoid schizophrenia and judges concluded his health could be damaged if extradited. Photo: JOHN COBB
Tom Whitehead

By , Security Editor

Haroon Aswat, from West Yorkshire, has been told he can stay in the UK even though he is accused of trying to set up a Jihad training camp in the US along with Hamza.

But the European Court of Human Rights has ruled his faces inhuman or degrading treatment if removed because of his mental condition.

Aswat, 39, suffers from paranoid schizophrenia and the judges concluded his health could be damaged because he faces possible detention in a US “supermax” prison if convicted.

The ruling was given even though the court accepted it was not clear exactly where Aswat would be detained.

He is accused by the US authorities of conspiring, along with Hamza, to establish a jihad training camp in Oregon Bly, Oregon between June 2000 and December 2001.

Hamza was extradited to America last year along with four other terror suspects but a decision on Aswat was adjourned pending further evidence on his mental health.

In the ruling given by a chamber of seven judges, the court said: “In light of the medical evidence before it, the court found that there was a real risk that Mr Aswat’s extradition to the USA, a country to which he had no ties, and to a different, potentially more hostile prison environment, would result in a significant deterioration in his mental and physical health.”

Despite receiving submissions from the US Department of Justice, the ECHR found that it could not be “determined with certainty” in which prison or prisons Mr Aswat would be locked up if sent to the US.

And the judges found that, if he was convicted, he could face the “highly restrictive regime” of ADX Florence, breaching Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits degrading or inhuman treatment.

A Home Office spokesman said: “We are disappointed that the European Court of Human Rights found that extradition to America would breach Haroon Aswat’s human rights.

“The judgment does not become final for three months and we will consider as a matter of urgency all the legal options which are available to us. This includes whether we request a referral of the case to the Court’s Grand Chamber.”

Daily Telegraph

“…the judges concluded his health could be damaged…” Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! What about the bloody health of his intended victims, pray? Let’s face it, the vile ECHR, E.U., Judges, and Politicians alike, are all totally UNFIT FOR PURPOSE, and should be replaced. SOON! Before they completely condemn us to the gutter.

You vote liblabcon? Then expect more and more of this!

A Wish List!

mailbag (2)

HERE IS ALL I WANT OUT OF LIFE AT THIS TIME…

Borders: Closed to further immigration.

Illegals: Found stopped and sent back.

National Commitment: Re-establish National Service.

Parliament: Obey its own laws. Make politicians keep their promises or have them disqualified from further election. No programmes scheduled to start past the next election.

Dual Citizenship: Abolished (you’re either British or something else. If you’re something else, be a visitor then leave when your visa runs out.)

Language: English, Welsh, Gaelic only.

Flags: Illegal to display another flag except for consulates and embassies.

Culture: Respect the British culture, and stop immigrants trying to change it into the mess left back in their own countries. Stop trying to change us!

Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare Benefits!

NO Freebies to Non-Citizens. Look after British BEFORE donating to other countries.

No British welfare for any country that is developing nukes or spending more than a reasonable amount on arms.

BRING ALL BRITISH SOLDIERS HOME – PUT THEM ON OUR STREETS AND SORT OUT ALL THE DRUGGIES AND MUGGERS AND PUT THE GREAT BACK INTO GREAT BRITAIN .

LET THE REST OF THE WORLD SORT THEIR OWN PROBLEMS OUT!

BRITISH PENSIONERS BEFORE ALL OTHER NATIONS.

Only 86% will send this on. Should be 100%. What will you do?

If you don’t send this on nothing will happen to you.

BUT, if you don’t you must be part of our home grown problem!!!

Union Jack medium

British Mother of Parliaments! Infested By Vermin!

MP Eric Joyce will not face charges over bar incident

Eric JoyceEric Joyce said he drank a modest amount of alcohol

MP Eric Joyce will not face charges following his arrest over an alleged brawl in a House of Commons bar.

Scotland Yard said it would be taking no further action following the incident earlier in March.

Last year, the independent MP was convicted of assault in the Strangers bar in the House of Commons and later resigned from the Labour Party.

In a recent blog post, the MP, who has said he will stand down at the next election, denied he was an alcoholic.

“I do not go into bars, nor drink in my office. Nor do I inject alcohol right into my eyeballs while crying”, he said in the blog.

Following his arrest in March, Mr Joyce was was held at Belgravia Police Station for around 20 hours before being released on police bail.

He was also banned from buying alcohol in the Houses of Parliament, pending the police investigations into the incident.

The Met police said: “A man aged in his fifties, arrested on Thursday 14 March … in connection with a disturbance in a bar within the House of Commons and bailed to a central London police station has been released with no further action today.”

The Crown Prosecution Service said that after receiving a complete file on the alleged incident, it had concluded there was insufficient evidence to bring charges.

“Although there appears to have been an incident on the evening in question, evidence obtained from witnesses contained multiple inconsistencies and there is insufficient evidence that Mr Joyce committed any offence,” a CPS spokesman said.

“On this basis, we have concluded there is insufficient evidence to support a realistic prospect of conviction and that no further action should be taken.”

The Parliamentary estate has eight bars and 19 other catering venues, most of which sell alcohol. It is also possible to buy specially-branded alcohol, such as the Speaker’s malt whiskey, from two gift shops.

Measures have already been taken to try to encourage more responsible drinking in Parliament, with staff told to cut down on topping up MPs’ glasses at receptions.

The authorities also say there have been “significant price increases” in alcohol sold in Parliamentary bars, which are “now comparable to high street pubs”.

Speaking outside court, after pleading guilty to assault in March last year, Mr Joyce said the fight was a “matter of considerable personal shame” and that the punishment was fair.

He was given a 12-month community order that included a Friday-to-Sunday curfew and a three-month pub ban. He was fined £3,000 and ordered to pay £1,400 in compensation to his victims.

“Drink was an aggravating factor, there’s no question about that,” he said.

“It’s something I have to deal with personally. Not everyone who drinks gets involved in fights and certainly when they are my age.”

a

a

a

Try putting a cop in a headlock and see what happens to you! These disgusting, thieving, lying, b*****ds are beneath contempt. AND YOU VOTE FOR THEM!!!!

In My Mailbag Today

conservative libdem Labour_Party.svg

 

Someone please tell me what the Hell is wrong with all the people that run this country!!!

LABOUR, CONSERVATIVES

&

LIBERALS, say

We’re “broke” and can’t help our own

Seniors,

Veterans,

Orphans,

Homeless,

etc.,???

In the last years we have provided direct cash aid to

Haiti- 1.4 B,

Hamas – 351 M,

Pakistan- 2 B,

Libya1.45 B,

Egypt- 397 M,

Mexico- 622 M,

Russia- 380 M,

Haiti- 1.4 B,

Jordan- 463 M,

Kenya- 816 M,

Sudan- 870 M,

Nigeria- 456 M,

Uganda- 451 M,

Congo- 359 M,

Ethiopia- 981 M,

South Afrika- 566 M,

Senegal- 698 M,

Mozambique- 404 M,

Zambia- 331 M,

Kazakhstan- 304 M,

Iraq- 1.08 B,

Tanzania- 554 M,

with literally Billions and they still hate us!!!


Our retired seniors living on a ‘fixed income’

Do they get any breaks while our government and religious organisations pour Hundreds of Billions and Tons of Food
to Foreign Countries!

We have hundreds of adoptable children who are shoved aside to make room for the adoption of foreign orphans.

AUSTRALIA, UK

& US

countries where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without needed medication and mentally ill without treatment… etc.

YET. . .
We still allow illegal “Deprived People” other free loaders on our shores.

While we are lining up with food, clothes, bedding, doctors and medical supplies.
Imagine if the “GOVERNMENT” gave ‘US’ the same support they give to other countries.

Sad isn’t it?

So! Was I Right about Alistair McGrigor?

http://dickiebo.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/the-shame-of-judge-advocate-alistair-mcgrigor/

Former SAS sniper Danny Nightingale ‘elated’ as court quashes weapon conviction

An SAS sniper who was jailed for illegal weapon possession said he was “elated” tonight after his conviction was quashed because a military judge improperly pressured him into pleading guilty.

By John-Paul Ford Rojas

3:50PM GMT 13 Mar 2013

Sergeant Danny Nightingale was “deprived of a free choice” when he was effectively warned that he would face a sentence of five years if he did not admit the charge, the Court of Appeal heard.

Senior judges criticised the conduct of Assistant Judge Advocate General Alistair McGrigor, who was alleged to have given a “direct wink” about the likely term Sgt Nightingale would face. They ordered a fresh court martial.

The soldier’s appeal centred on remarks – delivered in legal terminology and references to a previous case – made by the military judge during legal argument ahead of a trial that had been due to take place last November.

William Clegg QC, for Nightingale, said: “On the proper analysis, what the assistant judge advocate was saying here was ‘unless you plead guilty, you will receive a sentence of five years’.

“This is a message that should never have come from the bench.”

Transcripts of discussions between the soldier and his lawyer at the time showed Sgt Nightingale understood the remarks to mean: “If I fight this I will get five years.”

The court heard that his wife and father were both present and felt that he could not risk the prospect of such a long sentence.

Mr Clegg said that the soldier – who is father to two young children – was left facing the prospect of “a very long period of separation from them if he persisted in a denial of guilt”.

If locked up for more than two years, Sgt Nightingale would also have faced serving time in a civilian prison rather than military detention.

Overturning the conviction the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge – sitting with two other judges – said: “Our conclusion is that the defendant’s freedom of choice was indeed improperly narrowed.

“Accordingly, the plea of guilty is in effect a nullity to be set aside. The conviction based on the plea will be quashed.”

He said a judge must “maintain his distance” from discussions between defendant’s and their lawyers about whether to plead guilty to an offence.

“It is axiomatic in our criminal justice system that a defendant charged with an offence is personally responsible for entering his plea and that in exercising his personal responsibility he must be free to choose whether to plead guilty or not guilty,” Lord Judge added.

The Court of Appeal judges agreed that the judge advocate’s remarks would have conveyed to Sgt Nightingale that he was facing a sentence of no less than five years and “certainly no longer than two and very probably less” if he pleaded guilty.

The lower sentence would have had the added advantage for Sgt Nightingale of the “possibility that a military career could continue”.

Outside court Sgt Nightingale said he was “absolutely elated” but that the victory was slightly tarnished by the fact that he faced a retrial.

However he added: “We will attack if with the same vigorous tenacity that we have done with this.”

The soldier said that it was “frustrating” not to be able to serve in the Army while the case was ongoing.

His wife Sally, whose campaign on her husband’s behalf led to a public outcry and won the backing of David Cameron, said she was relieved but “saddened” that military prosecutors were seeking a retrial.

She said: “We are delighted with the outcome. There are mixed emotions… But tonight we’ll celebrate the fact that Danny is not convicted of a crime any more.”

Mrs Nightingale added that serving members of the SAS had been ordered not to speak to her husband.

Sgt Nightingale, 38, who has served in Iraq and Afghanistan, was given an 18-month sentence at the original court martial but was freed after this was reduced to 12 months and suspended by the appeal court.

The case centres on a Glock 9mm he had been given by Iraqi soldiers he had been helping to train. But the soldier, who had medical problems affecting his memory, said he did not remember having it.

If Sgt Nightingale is found guilty at a re-trial, he cannot be given any sentence which is greater than the suspended term handed down by the Court of Appeal.

In a statement, the Service Prosecuting Authority confirmed that a retrial would take place of the “sensitive and important” case but said it could not answer any further questions about it.

Daily Telegraph

Some of Today’s Comments!

well done your honour proper sentence that.

geoff, abergavenny, 6/3/2013 22:14

So sorry for the victims, and they have nothing to be ashamed of. I hope in time, they make a full recovery. For once, the Judge gave an appropriate sentence, and they should serve every day of it. Just an observation, but where did Shazad Rehman and Bilal Hussain learn that it was OK to use the expression * fresh meat* when applied to young girls? The Judge was right in saying *This type of crime is getting depressingly familiar in this Country.*

Maatkare, Cardiff, 6/3/2013 22:22

Should be swung, pigs.

Joe, Guelph, 6/3/2013 22:25

We are slowly waking up to this problem. The problem that some people wished was brushed under the carpet.

Ian, Rochester, United Kingdom, 6/3/2013 22:15

Hurrah we are getting there,Slowly.

AL, Birmingham, 6/3/2013 22:22

Such a pity that the screwed laws of this country neither allow us to comment truthfully on these matters or act as any sane society would.

From the Boiler Room, Where England once stood, 6/3/2013 22:21

not bad sentences for a change, once word gets around these sort of sentences might do what their supposed to do and act as a deterent.

ex-pat, nerja, 6/3/2013 22:19

An all too familiar story I’m afraid nowadays .

Cityboy07, Salisbury, 6/3/2013 22:14


‘What you did is depressingly familiar in this country’: Judge condemns pair who drugged and raped vulnerable underage girls before moving on to ‘fresh meat’

  • Shazad Rehman, 30, and nephew Bilal Hussain, 23, jailed today in Bradford
  • Underage vulnerable girls were picked up as the men cruised the streets
  • Known as ‘Yaz and Naz’ – they plied the girls with alcohol and cannabis
  • Girls were ’emotionally fragile and may have been seeking attention’
  • Judge said conduct was ‘pernicious, wicked and determined’

By AMANDA WILLIAMS

Two men have today been jailed for drugging and raping vulnerable underage girls they found walking the streets.

Shazad Rehman, 30, was jailed for 18-and-half years and his nephew Bilal Hussain, 23, was jailed for 17-and-a-half years at Bradford Crown Court.

Judge Jonathan Rose said the men ‘engaged in a course of conduct which has become increasingly and depressingly familiar in this country’.

The pair denied abusing the girls, who were picked up as they cruised the streets of Keighley and Halifax, West Yorkshire.

Shazad Rehman (30), of no fixed address, who was found guilty of raping two 14-year-old girls, one repeatedlyShazad Rehman (30), of no fixed address, who was found guilty of raping two 14-year-old girls, one repeatedly
Bilal Hussain

Shazad Rehman, 30, (left)  was jailed for 18-and-half years and his nephew Bilal Hussain, 23, (right) was jailed for 17-and-a-half years at Bradford Crown Court

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289170/Keighley-rape-trial-Judge-condemns-pair-drugged-raped-vulnerable-underage-girls-moving-fresh-meat.html#ixzz2MqSzhEMQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
a

Can you really believe that our wonderful police et al tried to imprison the leader of the British National Party for daring to bring these cases to notice? I guess that nobody can be right if it upsets the multi-cultural builders of society!

Lord Neuberger, UK’s most senior judge, voices legal aid fears

Lord Neuberger talks to the BBC’s Clive Coleman

Legal aid cuts could make people feel they cannot access justice and then “take the law into their own hands”, the UK’s most senior judge has said.

Legal aid in England and Wales will be restricted in a range of civil cases from April to cut a current £2bn bill.

President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, told the BBC the changes may even lead to higher court costs.

The Ministry of Justice said legal aid would still be provided “to those who most need it”.

The cuts mean people involved in a range of disputes, such as social welfare debt, employment, family problems, clinical negligence, divorce and housing problems will no longer be allowed legal aid.*

But funding will continue for some cases including family law involving domestic violence or forced marriage and debt and housing matters where someone’s home is at immediate risk.

It means many people will have to pay privately for advice, find charitable help or represent themselves in trying to solve their disputes.

The proposals are intended to cut the legal aid bill by £350m a year by 2015.

Read the full article on the BBC website.

a

a

a

*Great news! Let us stop these parasites from leeching OUR money to enrich the infernal lawyers!

How 30,000 Romanians have been arrested in the UK for violence and sex crimes in just five years

By JACK DOYLE

Romanians come second in the list of foreign nationals arrested by police for serious crimes, Scotland Yard has revealed.

Nearly 28,000 Romanian citizens have been held for serious offences in London over the past five years, including violence and sex crimes.

That puts it second only to Poland in the list of most arrested foreign nationals.

That Romania is so near the top of the list of foreign criminals will cause concern ahead of the dropping of border controls next year.

From January, the country’s 21million inhabitants, along with 7million Bulgarians, will obtain free access to Britain.

Both countries have been members of the EU since 2007 but from January 1 will have full rights to come and live and work in the UK.

Critics of mass immigration have warned it could mean 50,000 arrivals every year for the first five years – the equivalent of a city the size of Newcastle.

IMMIGRANT ARRESTS IN NUMBERS

27,725 Romanian nationals were arrested in connection with:

  • 142 rapes
  • 10 murders
  • 666 sex crimes
  • 303 robberies
  • 1,370 burglaries
  • 2,902 acts of violence

Number of Romanians in jail:

  • September 2011: 454
  • Last year: 624

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2285177/How-30-000-Romanians-arrested-UK-violence-sex-crimes-just-years.html#ixzz2M5fndmkZ

a

a

Personally, I’m thinking of moving to Eastern Europe! Coming?